 |
The amendment would have criminalized most day labor job
solicitation on sidewalks or public spaces anywhere in the City. |
 |
Day laborers fill an important economic need in our
community and are just trying to support themselves and their families
through hard work. |
 |
The proposed ban would have been an unconstitutional interference with
day laborers free speech right to seek jobs from employers in public spaces.
Nearly identical ordinances have been already been struck down by federal
courts in Los Angeles and other cities. |
 |
If the City is really concerned about alleged unsafe traffic
behavior by a few contractors or day laborers, then the solution is to fairly enforce the
already-existing traffic laws (e.g. impeding traffic, jay walking) - not to
broadly ban all day labor job-seeking. |
 |
Day laborers and community groups have asked the City to
work constructively with them on a concrete proposals to make day labor
job-seeking safe, dignified, and community-friendly. This is exactly
what the City Council has now agreed to do in response to the day laborers
successful appeal, establishing a Day Labor Advisory Committee to consider
better long-term policy alternatives. |